The Battle Bricks tier lists should be contextual. This site splits ranking pages by Chapter 5, anti-zombie, gachaless, tanks, ranged DPS, crowd control, boss killers, and upgrade priority instead of publishing one unsupported overall chart.
Ranking policy
The Battle Bricks tier lists should never be one image that mixes every unit into one universal ranking. A battler can be good in a Chapter 5 zombie route, weak in another restriction, useful as a tank, or only worth upgrading after a player has better economy. The site therefore uses use-case rankings.
Planned ranking pages
- Best Chapter 5 Battlers
- Best Anti-Zombie Battlers
- Best Gachaless Battlers
- Best Tanks
- Best Ranged DPS
- Best Crowd-Control Battlers
- Best Boss Killers
- Best Cheap Meatshields
- Best Alt Forms
- Best Units to Upgrade First
Required evidence
Every ranking should name the chapter, difficulty, recommended level, strengths, weaknesses, replacement units, recommended stages, patch date, and proof status. Until those fields exist, the page should be a framework, not a final ranking.
Why one tier list is risky
The Battle Bricks tier lists can mislead players if they ignore stage context. A cheap unit, a boss-damage unit, an anti-zombie option, and a reward unit solve different problems. Putting them into one universal S-to-D chart would hide the real question: what stage, difficulty, restriction, and owned-unit set does the player have?
Safer ranking format
The safer format is a set of small, sourced rankings. A Chapter 5 ranking should link to Chapter 5 routes. An anti-zombie ranking should link to zombie trait evidence. A gachaless ranking should say which units are accessible without gacha. A boss ranking should show the boss page where the unit worked. Until those links exist, this page should remain a planning hub.